It’s Election Day. Across the county, voters are heading to the polls to choose who will represent their party in the upcoming August general election. Except, of course, for those who aren’t.
What do I mean? I’m referring to voters who are crossing party lines and choosing the least objectionable candidate (in their view) in races where their own party has no candidate.
I’ve watched with great interest as one elected official has openly crossed party lines and encouraged others to do the same. (We covered this in a previous blog post.) I’ve also seen the Knox County GOP chair call for charges to be brought against this official.
We’re Asking the Wrong Question
What has surprised me most is the firestorm of debate on social media. Not because people have taken sides on whether this is legal, but because so few are asking a more fundamental question: is this right?
I don’t claim to fully understand all the legal nuances, and that issue may ultimately be decided in court—if it gets that far. But legality isn’t the only question worth asking. We should also be asking whether this is the kind of behavior we want from our elected officials.
What does this say about the integrity of those who choose to act this way—and who encourage others to do the same?
What is Integrity and Who Cares?
To answer that, we need to take a closer look at the word “integrity.” The Cambridge Dictionary defines integrity as “the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles that you refuse to change.” The American Heritage Dictionary defines it as “steadfast adherence to a strict moral code.” Even Wikipedia, which I don’t often rely on, describes it as “the quality of being honest and having a consistent and uncompromising adherence to strong moral and ethical principles and values.”
At the core of each of these definitions is honesty. It follows that when honesty is compromised, integrity is as well—at least in that area. So the question becomes this: can a leader of one political party sign a statement affirming they are a bona fide member of a party whose ballot they are choosing—when that ballot belongs to the opposing party—and still be considered honest?
Why does this matter? Why should we care if voters cross over and participate in another party’s primary?
According to Strategic Leaders Consulting, “when leadership lacks integrity, trust, loyalty, and respect begin to erode. This creates a toxic environment, weakens collaboration, and ultimately damages the organization’s stability and reputation.” Their conclusion is clear: integrity is essential to maintaining trust and preventing long-term damage.
What Will This Loss of Integrity Do to the Knox County Voters?
That same principle applies to government. When our leaders lack integrity, public trust erodes. Respect declines. And people begin to disengage.
Could this be part of the reason so many people choose not to vote? Have they lost so much trust in the system that they no longer believe their participation matters?
In my opinion, whether this action is legal is not the most important question. The more important question is this: did this Democratic leader compromise her integrity by pulling a Republican ballot? And if so, will that loss of integrity further damage the trust of voters in Knox County?
What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Please note: We welcome your comments and look forward to conversation on this topic. However, comments that are abusive or contain foul language will not be published on our website and will be removed from our Facebook page. We welcome your opinion but not abuse.